BNSS MR-TADF 发光分子:硫/硫取代

BNSS 是硫/硫取代的 B/N 发光分子。比较同系列文献中的自旋转化、OLED 效率随亮度变化与器件寿命。

一组配套 OLED 发光体用于考察硫族原子替换如何影响自旋转换、高亮度效率和工作稳定性。

材料形态
分散在主体薄膜中的发光体
功能
三重态利用与发光
应用
绿色有机发光二极管

结构

含 S/S 杂原子的 B/N 骨架。这一系列在保留相关分子骨架的同时,改变自旋–轨道耦合。

性能与功能

激发态路径
单重态和三重态通过相互竞争的自旋转换与衰减通道交换布居。
工作负载下的表现
比较各报告亮度下的实测效率。

器件与加工

  1. 分子构建

    已发表路线通过芳香族 C–N 偶联和含硼环的形成,构建发光体骨架。

  2. 主客体薄膜

    发光体以低浓度分散在主体材料中测量,并非孤立的气相分子。

  3. OLED 工作过程

    注入电荷在发光层中产生激发态;器件测量分别报告效率和稳定性。

Measured host-film photophysics

DMIC-TRZ 主体薄膜中发光体含量 1 wt%,惰性气氛

Experimentally inferred rate from measured prompt/delayed PL lifetimes and yields; not a direct elementary-state measurement

2PTZBN is named BNSS in the 2024 computational comparison.

Hu et al. (2022), main Table 1. Photoluminescence is separate from electroluminescence.
物理量数值
光致发光峰525 nm
光致发光量子产率91%
Prompt lifetime5.1 ns
Delayed lifetime20.7 μs
Singlet–triplet gap0.13 eV
RISC rate inferred from PL1.90e+5 s−1

Observed OLED performance

Device B: 1 wt% emitter in DMIC-TRZ, 50 nm emitting layer.

Within this four-device series, faster inferred RISC accompanies better efficiency at high luminance, while the best-EQE device has a shorter reported operational lifetime.

This series is not an isolated causal test of RISC versus lifetime. Heteroatom substitution changes other molecular and device properties.

Representative device values are kept separate from ensemble means. SI tables report averages for more than fifteen devices but the downloaded curves do not include replicate-level data or pointwise error bars.

Reported LT50 values are condition-specific laboratory device measurements, not service-life predictions.

Lines connect published observations only; no model is fitted to these device curves.

Hu et al. (2022): representative OLED measurements; initial luminance for LT50 = 1000 cd m−2.
Device / emitterEQE max / %EQE at 1000 cd m−2 / %EQE at 10000 cd m−2 / %LT50 / hEL peak / nmEL FWHM / nm
B / 2PTZBN34.629.515.45.652052

Compare efficiency at the operating brightness

All four Hu devices report EQE at 1000 and 10000 cd m−2. These tabulated checkpoints support a common-luminance comparison; each device’s peak EQE is its own reference, not a shared brightness.

Absolute loss = peak EQE − checkpoint EQE, in percentage points (pp). Relative roll-off = 100 × (peak EQE − checkpoint EQE) / peak EQE, in percent. Retained peak efficiency = 100 × checkpoint EQE / peak EQE.

2PTZBN at 1000 cd m−2: EQE 29.5% versus peak 34.6%; the loss is 5.1 pp, relative roll-off 14.74%, and retained peak efficiency 85.26%. These calculations use representative-device values, not ensemble means.

Measured electrical operating points

Hu et al. (2022) 的 A–D 器件;相同的真空沉积层结构;DMIC-TRZ 中发光体含量为 1 wt%,发光层厚 50 nm。 The dataset contains 83 observed operating points joined by exact luminance across the Figure 3d–f source sheets; no voltage or current is interpolated.

With J in mA cm−2 and V in volts, electrical input per area is J × V in mW cm−2; multiply by 10 for W m−2. Equal voltage is not equal brightness. Switching emitters in the interactive view selects the nearest observed brightness and displays its actual value.

Source lm W−1 values are photometric luminous efficacy, not dimensionless optical power efficiency. The separate πL/(10JV) check assumes Lambertian angular emission; agreement checks arithmetic without establishing the angular pattern. The selected display domain requires L ≥ 1 cd m−2, positive V/J and EQE within 0–100%; all raw rows remain downloadable.

No pointwise experimental error bars are supplied. These bipolar-device observations do not identify mobility, injection barriers or the cause of efficiency loss.

Actual source points at 4 V; electrical input is calculated, all other columns are reported. These are not common-brightness checkpoints.
Device / emitterJ / mA cm−2L / cd m−2Electrical input / mW cm−2Source efficacy / lm W−1
B / BNSS3.090372664.257212.3614867.71038

Device-ensemble evidence

Published device-ensemble summary, distinct from representative-device values and the single source curve

均值基于 15 个以上独立器件;逐条件样本数未提供。

原文未定义 ± 的统计含义。

Percentage points of EQE; not a relative percentage of the mean

These ensemble means must not silently replace the paper’s representative-device maxima or be used as pointwise error bars on the downloaded Figure 3e curves.

Ensemble mean and reported ± value; EQE in percent.
Device / emitterPeak EQEEQE at 1000 cd m−2EQE at 10000 cd m−2
B / 2PTZBN33.83 ± 0.8328.17 ± 0.6113.88 ± 0.78

Computed excited-state model

Exact integrated three-excited-state linear kinetics from rounded published computational rates; no new experiment or electronic-structure calculation.

The model uses published elementary rates for S1, T1 and T2. dp/dt = −A p; the integrated state residence is u = A⁻¹p0. Outcome probabilities are decay rates multiplied by residence times.

For optical initial excitation p0 = (1, 0, 0), the reproduced total radiative probability is 91.28%. The measured host-film PLQY is 91%. These are calculated and measured results from different evidence contexts; agreement with a published calculation is an implementation check.

The 1:3 singlet/triplet generation ratio is an assumed spin-statistical limit, not a measurement for these devices.

The default 25% extraction and 100% charge balance are illustrative scenario assumptions. Their product with model internal emission is not measured EQE.

Added first-order triplet loss is a hypothetical sensitivity parameter; it is not a fitted TTA rate, current density, oxygen concentration, or brightness.

Removing T2→S1 is a mathematical pathway test, not the prediction of a synthesizable molecule.

Omitted processes: Bimolecular triplet–triplet and triplet–polaron annihilation; Charge transport and spatial recombination; Host/morphology changes; Optical stack and dipole orientation; Chemical degradation and operational lifetime.

No statistical confidence interval is assigned to published computed elementary rates; two-significant-figure input rounding limits output precision. Slider results are sensitivities, not confidence bounds.

Shizu and Kaji (2024), published computed elementary rates / s−1. These are not the experimentally inferred effective kRISC.
起始态To S1To T1To T2Radiative decay非辐射衰减
S1—1.60e+62.00e+82.20e+82.10e+7
T12.00e+3—2.40e+91.00e+11.40e+1
T22.60e+82.40e+12—1.50e+32.70e+0

硫族元素替换与激发态动力学

元素记录将 O、S 与 Se 列为第 16 族元素。

O/S/Se 比较考察骨架内原子如何改变自旋–轨道耦合,以及涉及较高三重态的转移。解释这些变化仍需考虑分子几何和相互竞争的速率。

2024 年动力学计算包含 BNOO、BNSS 与 BNSeSe;BNSSe 列于实验比较。

共轭结构与发射能量

苯和联苯条目提供具体的芳香结构;已有低聚苯研究考察的是一组特定的吸收变化。

2025 年的分子对说明,“共轭越长、发光越红”并非普遍规则:在特定位置增加硼原子会改变电子分布,使发射蓝移。

低聚苯结果涉及另一系列分子的吸收。发射能量、前线轨道能量差和单重态–三重态能隙是不同的量。

Sources and reproducible analysis

Published measurements, source-derived rates and Mol2Mat calculations are identified separately. The downloads reproduce the analysis without claiming new synthesis, device fabrication or electronic-structure calculations.

Density-dependent excited-state losses

conditional-normalized-steady-state-model

All defaults are illustrative dimensionless assumptions; no rate is assigned to a selected BNOO, BNSS, BNSSe or BNSeSe emitter.

Spatially uniform, steady generation in a two-excited-state kinetic system. S1/T1 are coarse-grained states, not a reduction fitted to the separate S1/T1/T2 calculation.

Fixed first-order coefficients, no state filling, heating, diffusion gradients, charge transport, polaron annihilation, phosphorescence, singlet-singlet annihilation or chemical degradation.

fS=.25 is an assumed electrical 1:3 singlet:triplet generation fraction. fS=1 describes pure singlet generation, not an entire optical experiment.

TTA f=.25 is the stated effective branch convention. It is not a measured universal spin yield.

STA destroys one singlet and leaves one triplet after rapid higher-triplet relaxation.

Both a and b scale proportionally with G for a fixed material; changing only one load is a channel-isolation counterfactual.

The interactive comparison varies dimensionless generation load kTT G / KS² and scales kST G / KS² with it. The two-state sensitivity model is separate from the material-specific three-state calculation. It does not convert a measured OLED curve into collision-rate constants.

kTT*T^2 is effective annihilating encounters per volume per time. At f=1/4 the singlet source is +(1/4)kTT*T^2 and triplet sink is -(5/4)kTT*T^2. The NET excitation-number loss is kTT*T^2, not 2*kTT*T^2.

Illustrative model at kTT G / KS² = 1e−5; not measured device EQE.
方案每产生一个激发所发射的光子数Yield / own dilute limit
TTA only, kRISC / KS = 0.010.561160.63%
TTA + STA, kST / kTT = 1000.407744.06%
TTA only, kRISC / KS = 0.10.943598.65%

An operando test of competing mechanisms, 2026

King et al., Uncovering the Origin of Efficiency Roll-Off in TADF OLEDs. 15 wt% 4CzIPN in mCBP; 30 nm emissive layer.

TTA was negligible in this device; STA and polaron quenching explained the measured roll-off.

SPA dominated below about 100 mA cm^-2.

STA dominated above about 100 mA cm^-2.

The adjacent normalised TTA/STA exercise is a sensitivity calculation. It neither uses these fitted coefficients as presets nor reproduces the measured 4CzIPN device, which also requires SPA, TPA, charge densities and device geometry.

The ± values below are one standard deviation from fitting. An additional estimated 20% uncertainty in generation rate is excluded. The TTA upper bound is based on the fit’s 95% confidence interval. No independent reprocessing of the source raw dataset is claimed.

Model-inferred collision coefficients from measurements, cm³ s−1.
过程系数证据
Singlet–triplet annihilation3.90e-12 ± 5.00e-13Fit to film measurements
Triplet–triplet annihilation< 8.00e-15Film measurements; no nonzero estimate established
Singlet–polaron annihilation6.20e-13 ± 1.00e-14Fit to operando device measurements
Triplet–polaron annihilation6.00e-15 ± 1.00e-15Fit to operando device measurements

Evidence and limits

下方可查看 Hu et al. (2022) 的配套器件曲线,以及 Shizu and Kaji (2024) 按电子态区分的计算。

来源说明

参考文献